KaiAI tutor for anyone

Compare AI tools

Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (4 selected)
Chatbots
Research
Coding
Image
Video
Voice
Meetings
Design
Productivity
Audio
Writing
Agents
Dev Platform
Data
Marketing
Education
GitHub Copilot
B
Luma Dream Machine
A
Figma AI
A
Devin
A
TaglineMicrosoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.AI features baked into the design tool you already use.Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.
CategoryCodingVideoDesignAgents
PricingFree (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo BusinessFree + $10-$500/moIncluded with Figma plans$500/mo
Best forTeams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.Designers already on Figma.Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.
Strengths
  • Great enterprise story
  • Works in your existing IDE
  • Chat + autocomplete
  • Best image-to-video in the category
  • Great camera motion control
  • Ray 2 model produces striking shots
  • First drafts with Make Designs
  • Rename/rearrange layers automatically
  • Natural language asset search
  • Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs
  • Handles multi-hour engineering work
  • Reports back with what it did
Weaknesses
  • Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code
  • Model quality varies
  • Prompt fidelity below Runway
  • Queue times on free tier
  • Features vary by plan + region
  • Still rolling out
  • Expensive
  • Best for well-scoped tasks
  • Not for solo hobbyists
Kai's verdictB-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.
LinkOpen →Open →Open →Open →