Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Midjourney S	Leonardo.ai A	Devin A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	The aesthetic gold standard for AI image generation.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.
Category	Coding	Image	Image	Agents
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	$10-$120/mo	Free + $12-$60/mo	$500/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone who wants beautiful images without thinking about prompts.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best-in-class art direction v7 is stunning Great style consistency	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	No free tier Discord-first UX (web now available) Less controllable than ComfyUI	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for aesthetics. If you care how it looks more than how it's made, this wins.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →