Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Ollama S	Devin A	Lex A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Run LLMs locally. One-line install, GUI optional.	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.	Google Docs with an AI collaborator baked in.
Category	coding	dev platform	agents	writing
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + open source	$500/mo	Free + $12/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Devs wanting offline/local LLMs for privacy or experimentation.	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.	Essays, long-form drafts, thinking on the page.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Run Llama, Mistral, Qwen, etc. on your laptop Simple CLI + API Hardware-aware (picks the right quant)	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did	Clean writing UX — distraction-free +++ prompt triggers AI help Collaboration + AI feedback together
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Needs beefy laptop for larger models Speed way behind cloud APIs	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists	Less feature-rich than Google Docs AI ceiling below dedicated tools
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for local inference. If you care about privacy or want to tinker, install this today.	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.	A-tier. Beautiful UX. The writing app I'd pick if I only wrote long-form.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →