Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	OpenRouter S	Granola S	Cline A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	One API, every model. Pay-as-you-go, no subscriptions.	Meeting notes that don't suck. Runs locally, no bot joins.	Open-source VS Code agent. Reads + writes + runs.
Category	Coding	Dev Platform	Meetings	Coding
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Pay per token — model-dependent	Free + $18/mo	Free (open source) + your API costs
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Developers experimenting across models. Apps that want fallback logic.	Founders, execs, consultants who live in calls.	VS Code users who want agentic coding without changing IDEs.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	300+ models from one endpoint Automatic fallbacks between providers No subscription — just pay what you use	No bot in the call — runs on your Mac Strong templates Fast summaries	Free extension for VS Code Plan + Act modes Model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, local) Sees terminal output and iterates
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Slight markup over direct API Some provider features not exposed	Mac-only Single-user by design	Can burn tokens fast if not watched Less polished than Cursor
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for model-shopping. I use this for every prototype before committing.	S-tier. Category-defining UX. If you take notes in meetings, switch this week.	A-tier. Best free agentic option in VS Code. Use with Claude for best results.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →