Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	OpenRouter S	Sora A	Claude Code S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	One API, every model. Pay-as-you-go, no subscriptions.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	coding	dev platform	video	coding
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Pay per token — model-dependent	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Developers experimenting across models. Apps that want fallback logic.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	300+ models from one endpoint Automatic fallbacks between providers No subscription — just pay what you use	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Slight markup over direct API Some provider features not exposed	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for model-shopping. I use this for every prototype before committing.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →