Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Runway S	Hume AI A	ChatGPT S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Voice AI that reads + expresses emotion.	The default. Strongest ecosystem + best multimodal breadth.
Category	Coding	Video	Voice	Chatbots
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free tier + pay-as-you-go	Free + $20/mo Plus + $200/mo Pro
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Therapy apps, customer service, any voice agent where emotion matters.	General use, voice chat, image generation, first-time AI users.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Detects + mirrors emotional tone EVI (Empathic Voice Interface) feels different Expressive voice output	Great voice mode Huge plugin/custom GPT ecosystem Strong image generation (DALL-E built in) Code Interpreter
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Niche use case Pricing ramps fast	Reasoning quality varies by mode Can be verbose Confabulates on niche facts
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	A-tier in its niche. The only one that actually gets emotion right.	S-tier all-rounder. If you want one tool that does everything okay-to-great, this is it.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →