Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Sora A	Gamma A	Galileo AI B
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	AI slide decks that don't look AI-generated.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.
Category	Coding	Video	Productivity	Design
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Free + $10-$20/mo	Free trial + paid plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	Pitch decks, proposals, internal presentations — fast.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	Strong templates Decks, docs, webpages Doesn't look generic	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Locked into Gamma's format Export quality varies	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	A-tier. Best of a boring category. Use it for first drafts, then edit in Keynote if high-stakes.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →