Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Stable Audio A	Luma Dream Machine A	Cursor S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Stability AI's open audio model. Loops + SFX + background.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.
Category	coding	audio	video	coding
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12/mo Pro + enterprise	Free + $10-$500/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Game developers, podcasters needing SFX, video creators needing background music.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Open-weight model available Great for loops + game audio + SFX Commercial-use clarity	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Not for full songs with vocals Shorter generation limits	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for its niche. Different use case than Suno — SFX and loops, not songs.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →