Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Google Veo A	Luma Dream Machine A	Leonardo.ai A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.
Category	coding	video	video	image
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Free + $10-$500/mo	Free + $12-$60/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →