Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Windsurf A	Claude Code S	Copy.ai A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Codeium's agentic IDE. Cascade agent + strong free tier.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI GTM platform. Workflows for sales + marketing ops.
Category	coding	coding	coding	marketing
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $15/mo Pro	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $49-$249/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Developers who want Cursor-like power for less money.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	RevOps + marketing ops automating repetitive tasks.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Cheaper than Cursor Cascade agent for multi-file tasks Solid free tier	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Workflow builder for GTM automations CRM enrichment + outbound sequences Scales better than ad-hoc prompts
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Smaller community Model selection more limited	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Overlaps with general chatbots Workflow setup takes time
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Close second to Cursor. If $5/mo matters, start here.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier for ops automation. B-tier for simple copy (use Claude).
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →