Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (4 selected)
Coding
Image
Productivity
Writing
Marketing
GitNexus A | Recraft S | Perplexity S | Gemini A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | An open-source, MCP-native knowledge graph engine that gives AI coding agents (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf) genuine structural awareness of your codebase before they touch a single line. | Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output. | AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater. | Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot. |
| Category | Coding | Image | Research | Chatbots |
| Pricing | Free (MIT open source) | Free + $12-$48/mo | Free + $20/mo Pro | Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive) |
| Best for | Developers working in large or unfamiliar codebases who want their AI coding agent to stop making confident, structurally blind edits — especially Claude Code power users. | Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control. | Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds. | Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | GitNexus solves a real and underappreciated problem: AI coding agents are syntactically fluent but architecturally blind, and plugging a pre-computed knowledge graph into the MCP layer is the right fix. 28k GitHub stars in days suggests the pain is widely felt — just go in knowing it's a community project, not a polished product. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.) | S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously. | S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week. | A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |