Compare AI tools

	Granola S	Figma AI A	GitHub Copilot B	Claude Code S
Tagline	Meeting notes that don't suck. Runs locally, no bot joins.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	Meetings	Design	Coding	Coding
Pricing	Free + $18/mo	Included with Figma plans	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Founders, execs, consultants who live in calls.	Designers already on Figma.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	No bot in the call — runs on your Mac Strong templates Fast summaries	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Mac-only Single-user by design	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Category-defining UX. If you take notes in meetings, switch this week.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →