Compare AI tools

	Granola S	GitHub Copilot B	Claude Code S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Meeting notes that don't suck. Runs locally, no bot joins.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Meetings	Coding	Coding	Design
Pricing	Free + $18/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Founders, execs, consultants who live in calls.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	No bot in the call — runs on your Mac Strong templates Fast summaries	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Mac-only Single-user by design	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Category-defining UX. If you take notes in meetings, switch this week.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →