Compare AI tools

	Grok A	DALL-E 3 B	GitHub Copilot B	Sudowrite S
Tagline	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI writing tool built specifically for fiction writers.
Category	Chatbots	Image	Coding	Writing
Pricing	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	$19-$59/mo
Best for	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Novelists, screenwriters, fiction short-form writers.
Strengths	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Brainstorm, expand, rewrite modes designed for fiction Story Bible for character + plot tracking Understands voice + tone better than generic chatbots
Weaknesses	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Pricey for casual use Fiction-only focus — not for business writing
Kai's verdict	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for fiction. If you're writing a novel, this beats raw ChatGPT every time.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →