Compare AI tools

	Kling A	GitHub Copilot B	Cline A	Adobe Firefly A
Tagline	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Open-source VS Code agent. Reads + writes + runs.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.
Category	video	coding	coding	image
Pricing	Credit-based, free trial	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free (open source) + your API costs	Free + included with Creative Cloud
Best for	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	VS Code users who want agentic coding without changing IDEs.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.
Strengths	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Free extension for VS Code Plan + Act modes Model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, local) Sees terminal output and iterates	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem
Weaknesses	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Can burn tokens fast if not watched Less polished than Cursor	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription
Kai's verdict	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Best free agentic option in VS Code. Use with Claude for best results.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →