Compare AI tools

	Kling A	Symphony A	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A
Tagline	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.	OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Video	Agents	Coding	Design
Pricing	Credit-based, free trial	Free (open-source)	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.	Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price	Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR pipeline: every open Linear issue gets its own isolated Codex agent without manual supervision Fault-tolerant Elixir/OTP architecture automatically restarts crashed agents and manages hundreds of concurrent runs WORKFLOW.md keeps all orchestration policy version-controlled inside the repo, so agent behavior is reproducible and reviewable like code Proven internal results: OpenAI reported a 500% increase in landed PRs on some teams within three weeks Open spec encourages community re-implementations in any language, not just Elixir	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times	Currently only supports Linear as an issue tracker — GitHub Issues and Jira integrations are not yet official Only OpenAI Codex is officially supported as the agent runtime; other model integrations are community-contributed and incomplete Self-hosted, Elixir-dependent engineering preview with no built-in sandboxing — not suitable for untrusted or production environments out of the box	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.	Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →