Compare AI tools

	Kling A	Google Veo A	Recraft S	GitHub Copilot B
Tagline	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.
Category	Video	Video	Image	Coding
Pricing	Credit-based, free trial	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Free + $12-$48/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business
Best for	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.
Strengths	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete
Weaknesses	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies
Kai's verdict	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →