Compare AI tools

	Leonardo.ai A	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A	Genspark A
Tagline	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.
Category	Image	Coding	Design	Research
Pricing	Free + $12-$60/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans	Free + $25/mo Plus
Best for	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.
Strengths	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks
Weaknesses	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions
Kai's verdict	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →