Compare AI tools

	Leonardo.ai A	Google Veo A	GitHub Copilot B	Adobe Firefly A
Tagline	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.
Category	image	video	coding	image
Pricing	Free + $12-$60/mo	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + included with Creative Cloud
Best for	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.
Strengths	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem
Weaknesses	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription
Kai's verdict	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →