Compare AI tools

	Leonardo.ai A	Google Veo A	GitHub Copilot B	Sora A
Tagline	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.
Category	image	video	coding	video
Pricing	Free + $12-$60/mo	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro
Best for	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.
Strengths	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos
Weaknesses	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles
Kai's verdict	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →