Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (4 selected)
Coding
Image
Productivity
Writing
Marketing
Lex A | Symphony A | Perplexity S | Rows A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Google Docs with an AI collaborator baked in. | OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out. | AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater. | Spreadsheets with AI + live integrations baked in. |
| Category | Writing | Agents | Research | Data |
| Pricing | Free + $12/mo | Free (open-source) | Free + $20/mo Pro | Free + $19-$89/user/mo |
| Best for | Essays, long-form drafts, thinking on the page. | Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale. | Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds. | Ops teams, marketers, anyone building dashboards from multiple sources. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | A-tier. Beautiful UX. The writing app I'd pick if I only wrote long-form. | Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.) | S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week. | A-tier. The most interesting spreadsheet in years. Great for ops dashboards. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |