Compare AI tools

	Manus S	Cursor S	Perplexity S	Claude Code S
Tagline	Autonomous AI agent that actually finishes tasks.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	agents	coding	research	coding
Pricing	Free tier + $39-$199/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Pro	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	People who want to hand off tasks entirely — trip planning, research, spreadsheet building.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	General-purpose agent — research, book, build, analyze Parallel task execution Web browsing + file creation + coding	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Still hit-or-miss on complex multi-hour tasks Can burn credits fast	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	S-tier in the agent category. The first one I'd give to a non-technical friend.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →