Compare AI tools

	OpenRouter S	GitHub Copilot B	Elicit S	Galileo AI B
Tagline	One API, every model. Pay-as-you-go, no subscriptions.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.
Category	Dev Platform	Coding	Research	Design
Pricing	Pay per token — model-dependent	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free trial + paid plans
Best for	Developers experimenting across models. Apps that want fallback logic.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.
Strengths	300+ models from one endpoint Automatic fallbacks between providers No subscription — just pay what you use	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch
Weaknesses	Slight markup over direct API Some provider features not exposed	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often
Kai's verdict	S-tier for model-shopping. I use this for every prototype before committing.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →