Compare AI tools

	OpenRouter S	Sora A	Claude Code S	Figma AI A
Tagline	One API, every model. Pay-as-you-go, no subscriptions.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Dev Platform	Video	Coding	Design
Pricing	Pay per token — model-dependent	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Developers experimenting across models. Apps that want fallback logic.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	300+ models from one endpoint Automatic fallbacks between providers No subscription — just pay what you use	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Slight markup over direct API Some provider features not exposed	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier for model-shopping. I use this for every prototype before committing.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →