Compare AI tools

	Perplexity S	Cursor TypeScript SDK A	GitHub Copilot B	Genspark A
Tagline	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.	Wire Cursor's full coding-agent runtime into your own apps, scripts, and CI/CD pipelines with a few lines of TypeScript.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.
Category	Research	Dev Platform	Coding	Research
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro	Token-based; requires Cursor plan (Pro from $20/mo). Composer 2 at $0.50/$2.50 per M tokens (in/out); fast variant $1.50/$7.50 per M tokens.	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $25/mo Plus
Best for	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.	Engineering teams who already use Cursor and want to embed its coding-agent runtime into CI/CD pipelines, backend services, or internal developer tools without building agent infrastructure from scratch.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.
Strengths	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context	Same runtime as the Cursor IDE — no reinventing sandboxing, context management, or model routing Three execution modes: local machine, Cursor cloud VMs (isolated per-agent), or self-hosted workers for air-gapped teams Cloud agents are durable — keep running even if your laptop sleeps or connection drops, and can open PRs automatically on finish Full harness included: codebase indexing, MCP servers, skills, hooks, and multi-agent delegation via subagents Visible in Cursor's Agents Window — programmatic runs can be inspected or taken over manually in the IDE	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks
Weaknesses	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics	TypeScript-only SDK — no official Python or other language bindings at launch Public beta status means API surface and pricing can shift without much notice (Cursor has a track record of surprise pricing changes) Cloud VM costs layer on top of subscription credits, making cost estimation non-trivial at scale	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions
Kai's verdict	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.	If your team is already in the Cursor ecosystem, this is a genuinely compelling way to turn ad-hoc AI coding sessions into durable, automated workflows — but the beta label and Cursor's history with opaque pricing mean you'll want to set hard budget guardrails before going to production. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →