Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (4 selected)
Coding
Image
Productivity
Writing
Marketing
Perplexity S | Ideogram S | Symphony A | Flux (Black Forest Labs) A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater. | The one that actually gets text in images right. | OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out. | Open weights + strong photorealism. The open-source answer. |
| Category | Research | Image | Agents | Image |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Pro | Free + $8/mo + $20/mo + $60/mo | Free (open-source) | API + open weights (Schnell is Apache 2.0) |
| Best for | Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds. | Anything with text — posters, ads, album covers, slide decks. | Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale. | Developers + power users who want control and privacy. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week. | S-tier for text-in-image. Use this for posters, Midjourney for art. | Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.) | A-tier. S-tier if you self-host. The reason open-source image gen matters. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |