Compare AI tools

	Perplexity S	Symphony A	Groq S	GitHub Copilot B
Tagline	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.	OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out.	The fastest AI inference in the world. Crazy low latency.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.
Category	Research	Agents	Dev Platform	Coding
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro	Free (open-source)	Free tier + pay-as-you-go API	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business
Best for	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.	Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale.	Developers who need sub-100ms LLM responses.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.
Strengths	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context	Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR pipeline: every open Linear issue gets its own isolated Codex agent without manual supervision Fault-tolerant Elixir/OTP architecture automatically restarts crashed agents and manages hundreds of concurrent runs WORKFLOW.md keeps all orchestration policy version-controlled inside the repo, so agent behavior is reproducible and reviewable like code Proven internal results: OpenAI reported a 500% increase in landed PRs on some teams within three weeks Open spec encourages community re-implementations in any language, not just Elixir	500+ tokens/sec on Llama/Mixtral — feels instant Custom LPU hardware Great free tier	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete
Weaknesses	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics	Currently only supports Linear as an issue tracker — GitHub Issues and Jira integrations are not yet official Only OpenAI Codex is officially supported as the agent runtime; other model integrations are community-contributed and incomplete Self-hosted, Elixir-dependent engineering preview with no built-in sandboxing — not suitable for untrusted or production environments out of the box	Open-weight models only (no Claude/GPT) Less flexibility on custom configs	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies
Kai's verdict	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.	Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	S-tier for speed. When latency is the product, start here.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →