Compare AI tools

	Perplexity S	Google Veo A	Claude Code S	Luma Dream Machine A
Tagline	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.
Category	research	video	coding	video
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Pro	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $10-$500/mo
Best for	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.
Strengths	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots
Weaknesses	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier
Kai's verdict	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →