Compare AI tools

	Pika A	Claude Code S	Figma AI A	NotebookLM S
Tagline	The playful, accessible AI video tool.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Google's research notebook. Turns your docs into a podcast.
Category	Video	Coding	Design	Research
Pricing	Free + $8-$58/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans	Free
Best for	Social media creators, beginners, anyone wanting quick fun clips.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.	Students, researchers, anyone with a stack of PDFs or a topic to learn.
Strengths	Ingredients feature — combine people, objects, scenes Lip sync + sound effects Fun, approachable UX	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Upload anything, ask questions, get cited answers Audio Overview turns docs into a 10-min podcast Great for studying
Weaknesses	Lower fidelity than Runway/Kling Still rough on complex scenes	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Google-only Can be slow on large corpora
Kai's verdict	A-tier for social/casual. B-tier for serious work. Good entry point.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier for study. The Audio Overview is a killer feature. Try it with three of your favorite PDFs.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →