Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (4 selected)
Coding
Image
Productivity
Writing
Marketing
Rows A | Sudowrite S | Symphony A | GitHub Copilot B | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Spreadsheets with AI + live integrations baked in. | AI writing tool built specifically for fiction writers. | OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out. | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. |
| Category | Data | Writing | Agents | Coding |
| Pricing | Free + $19-$89/user/mo | $19-$59/mo | Free (open-source) | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business |
| Best for | Ops teams, marketers, anyone building dashboards from multiple sources. | Novelists, screenwriters, fiction short-form writers. | Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale. | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | A-tier. The most interesting spreadsheet in years. Great for ops dashboards. | S-tier for fiction. If you're writing a novel, this beats raw ChatGPT every time. | Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.) | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |