Compare AI tools

	Runway S	Cline A	GitHub Copilot B	Recraft S
Tagline	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Open-source VS Code agent. Reads + writes + runs.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.
Category	Video	Coding	Coding	Image
Pricing	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free (open source) + your API costs	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$48/mo
Best for	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	VS Code users who want agentic coding without changing IDEs.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.
Strengths	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Free extension for VS Code Plan + Act modes Model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, local) Sees terminal output and iterates	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs
Weaknesses	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Can burn tokens fast if not watched Less polished than Cursor	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	A-tier. Best free agentic option in VS Code. Use with Claude for best results.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →