Compare AI tools

	Runway S	Cursor S	Ideogram S	Claude Code S
Tagline	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	The one that actually gets text in images right.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	video	coding	image	coding
Pricing	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Free + $8/mo + $20/mo + $60/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Anything with text — posters, ads, album covers, slide decks.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Best text rendering in the game Strong free tier Good for logos, posters, thumbnails	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Less style variety	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier for text-in-image. Use this for posters, Midjourney for art.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →