Compare AI tools

	Runway S	GitHub Copilot B	Claude S	Midjourney S
Tagline	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	The aesthetic gold standard for AI image generation.
Category	Video	Coding	Chatbots	Image
Pricing	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	$10-$120/mo
Best for	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Anyone who wants beautiful images without thinking about prompts.
Strengths	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Best-in-class art direction v7 is stunning Great style consistency
Weaknesses	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	No free tier Discord-first UX (web now available) Less controllable than ComfyUI
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier for aesthetics. If you care how it looks more than how it's made, this wins.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →