Compare AI tools

	Runway S	GitHub Copilot B	Genspark A	Adobe Firefly A
Tagline	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.
Category	Video	Coding	Research	Image
Pricing	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $25/mo Plus	Free + included with Creative Cloud
Best for	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.
Strengths	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem
Weaknesses	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →