Compare AI tools

	Runway S	GitHub Copilot B	Leonardo.ai A	Claude Code S
Tagline	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	video	coding	image	coding
Pricing	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$60/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →