Compare AI tools

	Runway S	GitHub Copilot B	Leonardo.ai A	DALL-E 3 B
Tagline	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.
Category	Video	Coding	Image	Image
Pricing	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$60/mo	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo
Best for	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.
Strengths	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts
Weaknesses	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →