Compare AI tools

	Runway S	Stable Audio A	GitHub Copilot B	Recraft S
Tagline	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	Stability AI's open audio model. Loops + SFX + background.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.
Category	Video	Audio	Coding	Image
Pricing	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free + $12/mo Pro + enterprise	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$48/mo
Best for	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Game developers, podcasters needing SFX, video creators needing background music.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.
Strengths	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Open-weight model available Great for loops + game audio + SFX Commercial-use clarity	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs
Weaknesses	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Not for full songs with vocals Shorter generation limits	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers
Kai's verdict	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	A-tier for its niche. Different use case than Suno — SFX and loops, not songs.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →