Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Sora A | Claude Code S | GitHub Copilot B | Devin A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. | Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer. |
| Category | video | coding | coding | agents |
| Pricing | Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business | $500/mo |
| Best for | ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. | Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. | A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |