Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (3 selected)
Coding
Image
Productivity
Writing
Marketing
Sora A | Cursor S | Symphony A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality. | VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work. | OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out. |
| Category | Video | Coding | Agents |
| Pricing | Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro | Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business | Free (open-source) |
| Best for | ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots. | Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code. | Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros. | S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day. | Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.) |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → |