Compare AI tools

	Suno S	Sora A	Claude Code S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Prompt to full song with vocals, instruments, the works.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Audio	Video	Coding	Design
Pricing	Free + $10/mo + $30/mo	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Jingles, intros, demos, sketches, personal use.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Real songs with real lyrics v4 is very good Quick turnaround	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Copyright gray zone Audio quality behind studio	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	S-tier in its category. The first AI music tool I'd actually listen to.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →