Compare AI tools

	Symphony A	Claude Code S	Galileo AI B	Perplexity S
Tagline	OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.
Category	Agents	Coding	Design	Research
Pricing	Free (open-source)	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free trial + paid plans	Free + $20/mo Pro
Best for	Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.
Strengths	Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR pipeline: every open Linear issue gets its own isolated Codex agent without manual supervision Fault-tolerant Elixir/OTP architecture automatically restarts crashed agents and manages hundreds of concurrent runs WORKFLOW.md keeps all orchestration policy version-controlled inside the repo, so agent behavior is reproducible and reviewable like code Proven internal results: OpenAI reported a 500% increase in landed PRs on some teams within three weeks Open spec encourages community re-implementations in any language, not just Elixir	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context
Weaknesses	Currently only supports Linear as an issue tracker — GitHub Issues and Jira integrations are not yet official Only OpenAI Codex is officially supported as the agent runtime; other model integrations are community-contributed and incomplete Self-hosted, Elixir-dependent engineering preview with no built-in sandboxing — not suitable for untrusted or production environments out of the box	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics
Kai's verdict	Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →