Compare AI tools

	Google Veo A	Figma AI A	Claude Code S	Lex A
Tagline	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Google Docs with an AI collaborator baked in.
Category	Video	Design	Coding	Writing
Pricing	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Included with Figma plans	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $12/mo
Best for	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Designers already on Figma.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Essays, long-form drafts, thinking on the page.
Strengths	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Clean writing UX — distraction-free +++ prompt triggers AI help Collaboration + AI feedback together
Weaknesses	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Less feature-rich than Google Docs AI ceiling below dedicated tools
Kai's verdict	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Beautiful UX. The writing app I'd pick if I only wrote long-form.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →