Compare AI tools

	Google Veo A	Sora A	GitHub Copilot B	Leonardo.ai A
Tagline	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.
Category	video	video	coding	image
Pricing	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$60/mo
Best for	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.
Strengths	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier
Weaknesses	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming
Kai's verdict	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →