Compare AI tools

	Windsurf A	Claude Code S	Genspark A	Figma AI A
Tagline	Codeium's agentic IDE. Cascade agent + strong free tier.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	coding	coding	research	design
Pricing	Free + $15/mo Pro	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $25/mo Plus	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Developers who want Cursor-like power for less money.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Cheaper than Cursor Cascade agent for multi-file tasks Solid free tier	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Smaller community Model selection more limited	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	A-tier. Close second to Cursor. If $5/mo matters, start here.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →