Compare AI tools

	Windsurf A	Claude Code S	Sora A	DALL-E 3 B
Tagline	Codeium's agentic IDE. Cascade agent + strong free tier.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.
Category	coding	coding	video	image
Pricing	Free + $15/mo Pro	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo
Best for	Developers who want Cursor-like power for less money.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.
Strengths	Cheaper than Cursor Cascade agent for multi-file tasks Solid free tier	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts
Weaknesses	Smaller community Model selection more limited	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control
Kai's verdict	A-tier. Close second to Cursor. If $5/mo matters, start here.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →