Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via ?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.
Pick tools (4 selected)
Coding
Image
Productivity
Writing
Marketing
Windsurf A | Sora A | Claude Code S | Luma Dream Machine A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Codeium's agentic IDE. Cascade agent + strong free tier. | OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. |
| Category | Coding | Video | Coding | Video |
| Pricing | Free + $15/mo Pro | Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free + $10-$500/mo |
| Best for | Developers who want Cursor-like power for less money. | ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | A-tier. Close second to Cursor. If $5/mo matters, start here. | A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |