Quilty
B tiernew this weekAI screenplay analysis platform that scores your script, predicts box office, and suggests casting — though early tests suggest it wouldn't have greenlit some classics.
Kai's verdict
Quilty has a genuinely interesting idea — a multi-model orchestration system built specifically for Hollywood's creative-commercial decision stack — but the early reviews are rough, and 'we predicted this flop would be a hit' is a bad launch story to have. Worth watching if they iterate on the accuracy problem, but $49.99 for a report you can't fully trust is a tough sell right now. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)
Strengths
- Covers creative, commercial, and production dimensions in one report — more holistic than basic script-coverage tools
- Orchestrates 12 AI models sequentially rather than relying on a single LLM, adding some structural depth
- Accessible price point vs. enterprise competitors like Largo.ai that charge thousands per year plus backend fees
- Discovery Leaderboard gives unconnected writers a way to surface their work to browsing producers
- Claims not to use uploaded scripts to train its models, with US/EU data routing
Weaknesses
- Early independent tests showed unreliable predictions — it panned Oscar-winning scripts and surfaced directors with serious public controversies
- The core 'hit prediction' claim is unvalidated; the Quilty Score has no proven correlation with real-world box office outcomes
- No subscription model means it's pay-per-report, which gets expensive for writers iterating on multiple drafts
Best for
Indie writers and producers who want a structured first-pass coverage report and market framing before pitching, and who understand this is a starting point — not a greenlight oracle.
Pricing
Free preview + $49.99 per full report
Free tier gives a quick logline/score preview in minutes; $49.99 unlocks a ~40-page comprehensive report covering creative, market, financial, and production dimensions, generated in roughly 90 minutes. No subscription model currently.